I just received the 3/27/09 deposition transcript last week and it takes a few hours to read it all - it was an all day depo.
It’s primarily about how the lawyers LIE and about my damages and the purpose of this deposition was to harass me.
I REFUSED to answer numerous questions such as where I went to school, whether I have ever been arrested, who I spoke with about my litigation, etc. These questions only serve to intimidate and harass consumers. Their goal is to completely destroy consumers who dare to sue them.
They ask about the high school you attended because there’s always the possibility that you’ve been in trouble when you were a kid. There might be a newspaper article, they can contact the people in your class — it’s all about harassing and embarrassing the consumers and anyone associated with them.
If you’ve ever been arrested for anything, do you really want the world to hear about it? Or would you rather dismiss your case and try to go on with your life?
Please NOTE that Experian filed my entire UNREDACTED credit reports on PACER for ANYONE to download, judge Broomfield REFUSED to have the reports removed until I DISMISSED all my claims against Experian in exchange for the removal of my credit reports.
10/3/08: My petition for rehearing / en banc re. Experian filing my unredacted credit reports [DENIED!]
That’s how these criminals operate, fully supported by the 9th circuit court of appeals!
And this is of course why MOST (near) judgment-proof people should vote with their money and NOT pay their unsecured bank debts.
The “justice” system is designed to DESTROY the people INSTEAD of providing justice.
Since the CRAs continue to motivate me, this will be part of my next published FTC complaint. More on that in my next post.
Can you imagine having your coworkers, family, friends and neighbors served with subpoenas for either video depositions or to testify in court?
You might as well blow your brains out - you won’t have a friend left when they’re done with everybody.
And, that’s what I told the thugs on p. 103: Read More
